The New Standard for Electrical Maintenance

For decades, industrial facilities, commercial operations, and critical infrastructure have relied on a blend of experience, manufacturer guidelines, and industry recommendations to maintain electrical systems. However, with the recent formalization of NFPA 70B into a standard, there’s now a defined structure that organizations must reference when developing electrical maintenance practices. The shift from a recommended guide to a recognized standard marks a turning point for how companies approach system integrity and safety.

 doesn’t just outline tasks—it sets the foundation for a complete lifecycle approach to equipment upkeep, driving both operational reliability and workforce protection.


Why Maintenance Is Essential to Electrical Safety

Electricity is a constant force within industrial environments. It powers production lines, climate control systems, data centers, and life-sustaining equipment. But when maintenance is neglected, the risks escalate quickly. Faulty wiring, overloaded circuits, and worn insulation can lead to serious hazards including:

Arc flash incidents

Electrical fires

Equipment failures

Downtime losses

Worker injury or fatality

mitigates these risks by promoting proactive care over reactive fixes. The standard reinforces the principle that equipment should not only be installed correctly (per NFPA 70), but also maintained consistently to perform within safe limits over time.


The Role of Preventive and Condition-Based Maintenance

One of the key philosophies behind  is that maintenance must be strategic. It introduces a condition-based approach, allowing teams to assess asset health before scheduling interventions. This concept replaces outdated “calendar-based” tactics that often resulted in unnecessary inspections—or worse, missed failures.

The standard guides facilities to evaluate:

Thermal anomalies using infrared imaging

Insulation degradation through resistance testing

Mechanical integrity via vibration and ultrasound

Environmental stress such as moisture, heat, or dust intrusion

These assessments allow maintenance efforts to be targeted where they’re truly needed, improving uptime and reducing resource waste.


Linking Electrical Maintenance to System Reliability

Reliability is not just a convenience—it’s a core requirement in industries that depend on constant uptime. Power disruptions in a healthcare setting, for example, can lead to life-threatening delays. In manufacturing, unexpected outages mean lost productivity and high recovery costs.

By implementing an -aligned maintenance strategy, organizations can:

Extend the life of electrical assets

Detect failure modes early

Minimize unplanned shutdowns

Stabilize load distribution

Optimize energy usage

Reliability isn’t an accident—it’s the result of structured care. And this standard provides the blueprint for that consistency.


Core Elements of the Standard

 outlines a framework that can be adapted to facilities of all sizes. Whether a company is managing a data center or a local government building, the same principles apply. Key elements include:

Asset Inventory

Every circuit breaker, transformer, panelboard, and disconnect must be documented. This forms the foundation of an Electrical Maintenance Program (EMP).

Risk Categorization

Equipment is ranked by its criticality and exposure. Items in mission-critical areas or harsh environments receive higher priority.

Task Lists and Intervals

The standard assigns specific maintenance intervals based on asset type and condition. These tasks are no longer optional—they are systematically required once the program is adopted.

Qualified Personnel

Technicians must not only be trained, but also assessed for competency to perform the required procedures.

Inspection and Testing Protocols

Detailed requirements ensure each component is evaluated with industry-accepted methods, including non-contact and energized testing techniques.

Documentation and Records

Maintenance activity must be recorded in a way that allows for traceability and continuous improvement.


Integration with NFPA 70E and Other Standards

doesn’t exist in isolation. It closely connects with two other essential codes:

NFPA 70 (NEC) – Addresses how systems should be installed safely

NFPA 70E – Focuses on arc flash risk reduction and safe work practices

Together, they create a safety net: NFPA 70 ensures installations are compliant, NFPA 70E ensures workers are protected, and  ensures ongoing reliability through consistent maintenance.


Leveraging Software to Align with NFPA 70B

Implementing the standard manually is not only time-consuming—it introduces risk. Missed inspections, inconsistent records, or personnel turnover can derail compliance. This is where modern maintenance software solutions come into play.

These platforms help organizations by:

Mapping and tagging all electrical assets digitally

Assigning task frequencies based on condition scores

Automating reminders and documentation

Centralizing maintenance history

Flagging overdue actions or out-of-tolerance test results

With real-time visibility and audit-ready records, teams are better equipped to manage compliance without losing focus on operations.


Who Should Care About NFPA 70B?

The transition of  from guideline to enforceable standard has far-reaching implications. Organizations that should be closely tracking this change include: Click here

Facility and plant managers

Electrical maintenance supervisors

EHS and compliance officers

Insurance risk auditors

Consulting engineers and contractors

Whether due to internal policy, insurance requirements, or jurisdictional enforcement, these groups need to understand the requirements and implications of adopting the standard.


Preparing for Compliance in 2025 and Beyond

As adoption accelerates and jurisdictions begin to enforce maintenance standards more rigorously, forward-thinking organizations are using this window of time to modernize their EMPs. That means:

Auditing existing maintenance routines

Upgrading tools and training

Digitizing recordkeeping processes

Prioritizing high-risk assets for immediate assessment

Aligning policies with  task requirements

By acting now, teams can avoid being caught off guard when enforcement—or an incident—occurs.

15.JPG